Blog

SORTEE member voices – Kimberley Mathot

[SORTEE member voices is a weekly Q&A with a different SORTEE member]
   

Name: Kimberley Mathot.
 

Date: 04 July 2021.
 

Position: Assistant Professor.
 

Research and/or work interests: Behavioural ecology, foraging, energetics, multi-level variation.
 

What institutional policies do you see as most important to change to improve the reliability of science? (‘institution’ broadly defined including funders, journals, universities, etc.)
There should be mandatory archiving of all data and scripts necessary to reproduce the results in a study, with checks in place to ensure that it actually happens. Unfortunately, as it currently stands, this is often not done even when mandated, or it is done, but the “archived” data and scripts are so poorly described or incomplete that they lack utility.    

Continue reading

SORTEE member voices – Peter Mikula

[SORTEE member voices is a weekly Q&A with a different SORTEE member]
   

Name: Peter Mikula.
 

Date: 04 July 2021.
 

Position: Postdoctoral Researcher.
 

Research and/or work interests: Macroecology, behavioural ecology, birdsong, geography of fear, conservation culturomics.
 

What ‘ORT’ practice have you introduced into your research practice that you’ve found really helpful?
Whenever possible, I publish raw data along with my papers. In ecological studies, it is still a common practice not to publish raw data or to publish transformed data which often can not be used for different research questions. I found it frustrating. But rather than wait for the others, I have changed my own approach.    

Continue reading

SORTEE member voices – Paul Robinson

[SORTEE member voices is a weekly Q&A with a different SORTEE member]
   

Name: Paul Robinson.
 

Date: 03 July 2021.
 

Position: Conservation Manager, Tacugama Chimpanzee Sanctuary, Sierra Leone.
 

Research and/or work interests: Bird and mammal population assessment through a mix of field methods (passive acoustic monitors, camera trap and more traditional site sampling) and analytical methods for imperfect detection (occupancy and spatial capture recapture) implemented in R.
 

How did you become interested in open research?
Being unable to reproduce results from scientific papers.    

Continue reading

SORTEE member voices – Andrew Kadykalo

[SORTEE member voices is a weekly Q&A with a different SORTEE member]
   

Name: Andrew Kadykalo.
 

Date: 03 July 2021.
 

Position: PhD candidate.
 

Research and/or work interests: Andrew Kadykalo is a PhD Candidate in the department of Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. He is also a research associate at the Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation and Environmental Management (CEBCEM). He is an interdisciplinary conservation scientist who applies natural and social science tools, including policy-relevant systematic evidence syntheses, interviews, and cognitive mapping to explore relationships between people and nature. His research interests focus on predicting the delivery of regulating ecosystem services (e.g. pollination, flood regulation), and the use of evidence in wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. He is a Research Impact Canada (RIC) engaged scholar, A Community on Ecosystem Services (ACES) fellow, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) fellow in wildlife management, and is engaged in Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) functions as an early career researcher..
 

Continue reading

SORTEE member voices – Benjamin Marshall

[SORTEE member voices is a weekly Q&A with a different SORTEE member]
   

Name: Benjamin Michael Marshall.
 

Date: 03 July 2021.
 

Position: Researcher.
 

Research and/or work interests: Animal movement and spatial ecology.
 

If you had the power to change one thing about current incentives in your career path, what would it be?
I would like to see less emphasis placed on novelty. I see great value in undertaking the same research as others independently, be that a deliberate repetition or in isolation. Examining differences/similarities between research efforts can not only show interesting variation in the study subject, but also in the way researchers conceptualise and tackle a question. I’d love to see a greater appreciation for the value of repeated non-novel work and how it can build towards a more confident consensus. Deprioritizing novelty could relieve fears of being scooped and the rush to publish; relaxing time and publication pressure in science is sorely needed. There is little sense in building something up if the foundations are not solid.    

Continue reading

SORTEE member voices – Rob Knell

[SORTEE member voices is a weekly Q&A with a different SORTEE member]
   

Name: Rob Knell.
 

Date: 03 July 2021.
 

Position: Reader at Queen Mary University of London.
 

Research and/or work interests: Evolutionary ecology, more specifically how mating systems influence adaptation, extinction and population dynamics. Animal contests and the evolution of weaponry. Disease ecology on occasion. Statistics.
 

What ‘ORT’ practice have you introduced into your research practice that you’ve found really helpful?
Recording data analysis as an rmarkdown document rather than just a script. This allows a much more extensive record to be kept along with the output from the analysis as well as the code, and is much easier to understand when you come back to an analysis some time after it was done. You can then publish the rmarkdown file along with a paper, either as an appendix or a supplementary file or with the data file in a repository like Dryad. This way the code and the full output of the analysis is open and available. Everyone benefits: we benefit because our records are as good as they can be, and anyone interested in our publication benefits because the full analysis is available.    

Continue reading